toughest battle yet - your suggestions, please

HarleyK

Canister Man
Staff member
Global Moderator
MFK Member
Aug 17, 2005
6,967
1,720
1,453
USA
Howdy,

Last December, I was facing nitrates exceeding 200 mg/L despite frequent, large water changes. No doubt: Piranhas are messy eaters and greedy pigs. The solution: A drip system. No problems any longer, or so I thought. At 3 gal/h my tank water should be pristine. After all, that equals a 50 % water change every other day.

Until mid-June. I can home and had massive algae almost over night. I thought undiscovered leftovers had spoiled the tank, removed affected foliage, and flushed the tank with fresh water.

Below are pics of what grows in my tank now. It's ugly. I ran a full battery of tests, everything I had on my shelf. Here's the outcome, as tank water, as treated water which comes through my drip system, and as tap water:

conductivity

  • 400 uS tank
  • 370 uS conditioned water
  • 350 uS tap
iron

  • 0.1 mg/L tank
  • 0.1 mg/L treated water --> I need to increase fertilization
  • 0.0 mg/L tap
pH

  • 5.5 tank --> close enough to tap on the scale
  • 6.0 treated water
  • 6.0 tap
gH

  • 120 ppm (soft) tank
  • 120 ppm (soft) treated water
  • 120 ppm (soft) tap
alkalinity (kH)

  • 80 ppm tank --> I am not overly worried about a pH crash because of the continuous influx of fresh water
  • 80 ppm treated water
  • 80 ppm tap
nitrates

  • 10-20 mg/L tank --> Perfect balance for plants
  • 10 mg/L treated water
  • 10 mg/L tap
nitrites

  • 0 mg/L tank
  • 0 mg/L treated water
  • 0 mg/L tap
phosphates

  • 5 mg/L tank
  • 5 mg/L treated water
  • 5 mg/L tap (this is the first time I measured phosphates in my current location)
IMG_9516.JPG

IMG_9517.JPG

IMG_9518.JPG

IMG_9521.JPG

IMG_9541.JPG

IMG_9550.JPG

IMG_9596.JPG


All right, so I have a serious phosphate problem. Besides, I think (please check out the pics and correct me) I have bearded algae. According to Mergus Aquarium Atlas, they occur preferentially around filter outlets. And indeed, that's where they are in my tank. I have two outlets on the left side of the tank, and the right side is completely free of algae. What's more, I didn't have these algae until June, and I added a second 900 gph filter to my system in May. One month for the system to react sounds about right.

I think this is the perfect storm:

  1. high flow region
  2. low iron means reduced nutrient competition by plants
  3. phosphates in tap water
I am going to:

  1. drill additional holes into my spray bars to reduce flow velocity
  2. increase iron fertilization in drip system
  3. add phosphate absorbing filter media into drip line before water enters the tank.
Any other suggestions??? Other remedies in the fight against this nuisance? I heard Flourish Excel might be successful at chemically killing off algae without effects on other organisms?!

If you have experience with phosphate absorbing media, please post -- HERE <--.

Thanks in advance,
HarleyK
 

aquaculture

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
May 5, 2009
1,831
0
0
In search of Leiarius
Those plants need a save, Ill be watching to see whats the solution.
so BUmp.
 

HarleyK

Canister Man
Staff member
Global Moderator
MFK Member
Aug 17, 2005
6,967
1,720
1,453
USA
Thanks. Here's what the tank looked like in March :(

IMG_8664.JPG
 

aquaculture

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
May 5, 2009
1,831
0
0
In search of Leiarius
Wow its like the tank got some moon light and went from model tank to ware tank.

Bump, Amazing planted by the way.
 

jcardona1

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Jun 5, 2007
11,491
40
0
42
South of Heaven
man those are some serious algae problems! youre not adding co2 into this tank right? from the looks of it, i see BBA (black brush algae) and GDA (green dust algae on your glass).

i always refer to this page for algae solutions. you'll see the almost ALL algae issues are caused by low levels of co2. Excel will help, but it may wipe out your shrimp population, so do more research before dumping it in.

i'm confident that co2 will solve your problems, even though you think it's a myth ;)

http://theplantedtank.co.uk/algae.htm
 

jcardona1

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Jun 5, 2007
11,491
40
0
42
South of Heaven
interesting note about the BBA. seems like your excess water changes could be part of the problem...

f you have a low light tank without CO2 injection then not doing any water changes will help. This is because tap water often has lots of CO2 dissolved in it which causes CO2 levels in your tank to fluctuate. The algae respond to this a lot quicker than the plants do.

Siamese Algae Eaters are known to eat BBA so can be used to control this algae.
Overdosing Flourish Excel will clear it up.
 

HarleyK

Canister Man
Staff member
Global Moderator
MFK Member
Aug 17, 2005
6,967
1,720
1,453
USA
jcardona,

Thanks a lot, your help is much appreciated. Great link :thumbsup:

As you know I am no stranger to CO2. But it's been a while, thus, please help me understand: What I remember from when I used CO2 in the late 90s is the pH/kH relationship: My kH is 80 ppm, which equals 4.5 degrees. My pH is around 6. That means (according to CO2/kH tables) that my natural CO2 levels are off the chart anyways, somewhere around 120-150ppm?! That seems strange. Still add more!?

What's your take on the high phosphates, or is that something you planted CO2 tank gurus fertilize for? (I've been known to add nitrates to heavily planted tanks)

I am not so certain about the effect of heavy water changes. My drip system has been running for half a year, and the algae didn't appear until last month :confused::confused::confused: Besides, these water changes are needed or my nitrates go thru the roof again ...

As for Excel and shrimp, I was very wary about that myself and did some research: The acute toxicity of glutaraldehyde (polymer should be less toxic) on fish lies around 10-40 mg/L, for invertebrates 11-33 mg/L, for algae 0.6-0.8 mg/L (see --> IUCLID file <--). That's two orders of magnitude difference. Furthermore, a fellow member (ridehardorgohome) posted --> THIS <--. I think I'll have to try...

Thanks again, I am looking forward to your comments, especially on the pH/kH/CO2 relationship.

HarleyK
 

jcardona1

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Jun 5, 2007
11,491
40
0
42
South of Heaven
hey Harley,

while the ph/kh chart is an accurate way to measure co2 levels, it will often give you skewed results. here's why: the kh levels in your tank are influenced by many different factors; sediment, substrate, rocks, wood, etc etc. all of these things will swing your kh levels one way or another. because you dont have a true and accurate kh reading to begin with, your results will be skewed.

because of this, planted tank guys rely on a drop checker. i'm sure youve heard of drop checkers. theyre genius little devices. there's lots of articles online explaining how they work, but you basically fill the drop checker with a solution that has a truly accurate and SET/KNOWN kh value. right now most people are using a lab certified (or home-made) 4 degree KH solution, or 4dkh. 4dkh solution in the drop checker, then add a few drops of bromothymol blue (the solution we use to check our ph). you add drops until the solution turns a deep blue color. place it in your tank and in a few hours see what happens.

now back to the ph/kh chart. ok, we have 4dkh solution. that is our constant and is not gonna change or get influenced by other things in the aquarium environment. when the drop checker turns a deep green color, that correlates to 30ppm of co2 according to the chart. 30ppm of co2 is considered optimal levels at this time in the hobby. blue color means your co2 is too low, and yellow means its too high and could kill your fish. a drop checker is really the cheapiest and easiest way of knowing what our co2 levels are.

im confident your drop checker wont show 120-150ppm of co2!!! its hard enough to get 30-40ppm of co2 using a pressurized system! get a drop checker and youll see that co2 should be at low levels in your tank.

now about phosphates. rex grigg recommends keeping phosphate levels at 1-2.0ppm for a planted tank. i did a little bit of reading on plantedtank.net and there were some people concerned with high phosphate levels, but the experts say this is no cause for concern. people have reported much higher phosphate levels with no problems. and here, Tom Barr states that he adds as much as 15ppm of PO4 (phosphates) and this guy is a true planted tank wizard. here's his response:

Let's get one thing straight, low KH=> this might offer you some benefit.
Low PO4 will offer you no benefit.

I'm adding 15ppm + per week to my tank and I have rich PO4 in the sediment as well.



Where O where is my problem PO4's? Why would I add this much?
Why is it that I have sold 300-400$ per month of plants out of this one tank?
Why are my Cardinals fat, firsky and bite me when I put my hand in the tank?
Why is it that I have a lot of CRS and cull off 100 per month for sale?

I've been adding high PO4 since 1993, did not realize till about 1996, added even more around 1999, and this routine about 4 years ago.

Now where is the issue and risk again with PO4?
There might be other issues with the tap, but PO4 ain't one of them.


Regards,
Tom Barr

and to be honest, i think we're over complicating things here. i dont think there's a need to get in too much to the water chemistry stuff. all the problems ive dealt with, and what ive seen people encounter come down to two basic issues. CO2 & LIGHTING. too much of one and not enough of the other is responsible for more problems in a planted tank than anything else. i would try dosing a lot of Excel and see how it goes. although your tanks seems to be of a good size, it may get expensive doing it long term...

let me know your thoughts :)
 

epond83

Plecostomus
MFK Member
Nov 10, 2009
801
53
61
Duvall, WA
Had i seen this sooner i would have said pretty much what jcardona1 has said.

I had BBA in a 40 gal and i started a (2) 2 little DIY CO2, eventually it went away. You need the Plants to out compete the algea. How long are you running your lights? Beyond 8 hours and you start helping the alfea more then the plants. Ecel is good since it's a carbon source (just like CO2) but it could be pricey for a large tank.

Maybe slow down the drip system and see what happens to the nitrates, maybe the plants will step up and absorb more. but 10-20 does seem about right for plants.

Is there a window shinning on the tank? June is about the time for the sun to have more energy and start causing problems.
 

HarleyK

Canister Man
Staff member
Global Moderator
MFK Member
Aug 17, 2005
6,967
1,720
1,453
USA
Howdy,

Thanks epond83, but no direct sunlight. My lights are on for 7+6 hours with one hour interruption. I have been doing this lighting scheme for over 20 years, and I've had these specific lights for 5 years (w/ new bulbs regularly). This is my first time with algae problems. I doubt it's the lighting. As for the drip, when I reduce the drip to 1 gal/h nitrates go up to 50 ppm. My shrimp don't like that ...

jcardona, looks like the simple pH diffusion chambers from the 90s have come a long way:cool:. I agree that my "theoretical" CO2 content is unrealistic, but I'm not quite ready to make the step into a new CO2 endeavor. ;) This tank has been running w/o CO2 in its current location for 2 years, and these algae problems are new. I kept lighting constant by regular bulb renewal. There must be something else. The fact that I only have algae in one half of my tank (side of filter outlets) and the fact that they coincided with addition of my second filter make me blame the flow velocity. That's what I'll tackle first.

The info on phosphates is very interesting, thank you for that :thumbsup:. But I also have to admit that I remain skeptical. After all, it was phosphates from laundry detergents that caused algae blooms in ponds and lakes in the 1980s. I see how it might be necessary to dose phosphates, just like it is sometimes necessary to dose nitrates - if that specific nutrient is a limiting factor. That's definitely the case in a CO2 powered, high light, high ferts tank. Tom's tanks are a different league, but I will definitely keep it in mind!!! Bottom line I agree it's not the phosphates alone, or I would have algae in my entire tank, not just half of the tank....

I also absolutely agree that Excel is an expensive additive for a 220 gal tank. No kidding. I will run it for a few weeks just to kill off the algae. I am aware that that treats the symptoms, not the cause.

All right, this is my approach:

  1. remove as much algae as I can, by cutting off leaves and by sterilizing equipment covered with it, such as filter outlets.
    --> Just get the crap out!
  2. Drill additional holes into filter outlets to reduce water velocity
    --> following my bible, the Mergus Aquarium Atlas
  3. Dose Flourish Excel and increase iron levels
    --> kill off remaining algae and increase competitiveness of macrophytes
At the same time, I will look into chemical filtration for phosphates, just to have that ace up my sleeve if needed. I will also keep CO2 in the back of my mind. If these algae wear me out over time and I am to the point of caving in, I'll drop you a line asking for recommendations on equipment. :)

I'll report back in a few weeks on how things are turning out. I assume this is not going to be resolved within a couple of days...

Again, thanks for the input. That's what makes MFK great.
:cheers:
HarleyK
 
zoomed.com
hikariusa.com
aqaimports.com
Store