http://images.google.com/imgres?img...v=/images?q=flowerhorn+parrot&um=1&hl=en&sa=N
Magazine publishes guide to cosmetic fish surgery
Tail-less Flowerhorns and Parrots are produced with scissors, not selectively bred as previously believed.
A Singapore aquarium magazine has published an article which shows how cosmetic surgery can be performed on pet fish by amputating their tails and injecting them with dyes.
The article published in Chinese in Fish Love Magazine, provides a step-by-step guide to producing a tail-less Flowerhorn cichlid using a pair of scissors and some antibiotics, and offers details on how to produce dyed Parrot cichlids using a hypodermic needle and some food colouring.
Prior to its publication there had been no direct evidence that the tail-less flowerhorn cichlids or heart parrots sometimes sold in the UK were produced by tail amputation, or that the widely available parrot cichlids with a solid body colour derived the colouration from dye injections.
"Compared to Michael's 'brave deeds', to perform tail reconstruction surgery on blood parrots and flowerhorns would only be a small molehill compared to the Himalayas", the article says.
"Many have shown great and grave concern over the issues of 'pet cosmetic surgery'. What we have observed is: Despite countless protests and efforts by SPCA and other animal-loving organisation and support-groups, such surgical processes are still be carried out equally, if not more rampantly. These fishes that had undergone the 'facelift' operations command a much higher premium than the normal fishes which have not."
Tail amputation
In a gruesome sequence of images, a small Flowerhorn cichlid is shown having its tail amputated with a pair of scissors, apparently without an anaesthetic. The wound is then cleaned, and the now tail-less fish is pictured in an aquarium dosed with an anti-bacterial medication to prevent the wound becoming infected.
The translated captions read: "The fishes are carefully selected, usually between 1-1.5" in length, when the caudal fin rays have not fully developed or hardened. Position the scissors or abrasive tool on the spot where the incision is to be made and make a decision to snip! Select a spot which is slightly past the caudal peduncle for the incision so as not to damage the main body of the fish. Apply a generous amount of 'anti-inflammation' medication to minimise bacterial infection."
The article then advises not keeping fishes with their "tails snipped" in community tanks with fishes that have not undergone the process. It goes on: "To be on the safe side, fishes that have undergone the operation should be first kept in a tank containing antibiotics and anti-bacterial medication.
"Fishes that had undergone the surgical removal of their tails should be monitored closely then after. It would take approximately two weeks for the wounds to heal effectively."
Dye your own fish
There has been a great deal of speculation about the methods in which dyed parrot cichlids are produced. Evidence from the fisheries industry has shown that certain dyes can be taken up when fish are held in a dye solution over an extended period, and this was widely believed to be the method in which coloured parrot cichlids were being produced.
The article provides evidence to show that the Parrot cichlids are actually produced in a similar manner to other dyed fishes, using multiple injections of food colouring from a hypodermic needle.
The translated picture captions read: "Just as people would have their eye-lids done, fishes can also be made more appealing. But instead of the surgical scalpel, all can be done with a simple needle.
"Essential tools for the transformation - syringes, food dyes and disposable gloves. It would take about a day or so for the injected dyes to spread to the desired portion. Injected fishes should not be kept with plecos. The latter would suck and 'feast' on the food colouring.
"Before the transformation the fish looks lively and active. For the first few hours after colour injection, the fish might appear lethargic and listless. Not to worry! It would revive to its bubbly old self in a day's time."
"Post-transformation. Voila! Isn't it dazzling? This shows that fishes too need to spice up their lives with some colour!"
The photographs taken during the course of dye injections show that the dye has been injected in a line above the fish's lateral line. The pigment soon spreads to cover much of the flanks of the fish producing a solid colour which still has a slightly darker line of dye where the pigment was injected.
Legal in the UK
Defra and the RSPCA confirmed to Practical Fishkeeping that the process of dyeing fish using these techniques could possibly constitute mutilation under the Bill, and a prosecution could be undertaken as a result if the fish were being mistreated in this country.
No anaesthetic is mentioned in the DIY guide to cosmetic fish surgery.
Dyed Parrot cichlids are one of the most widely sold dyed fishes in the UK. Heart parrots, which have had their tails cut off, are also seen occassionally.
However, a loophole in the forthcoming Animal Welfare Bill means that it will not be illegal to import fishes mutilated overseas.
Practical Fishkeeping has been running a successful campaign against the sale of dyed fish since 1996 and around 75% of the UK's aquatic retailers have signed a pledge saying that they will not stock fish that have been mutilated in this way.
New varieties of dyed fish are appearing with increasing regularity. In February 2006 we reported that a Hong Kong based aquarium company was offering a service in which it would tattoo words, logos or patterns upon the flanks of fish using a laser.
You can find more details on the dyed fish trade in our FAQ on dyed fish.
The Ornamental Aquatic Trade Association told Practical Fishkeeping that it does not recommend that any of its members trade in these fish.
Fish Love magazine declined to comment.
This article may not be reproduced without permission.
Matt Clarke: Mon June 12, 2006, 8:37 am
Matt Clarke: 12.6.2006
More: Dyed Fish Campaign
Views: Read 25,577 times
Posted by: Carole Jones - 2 years, 5 months ago
Date: Thursday July 13th, 2006, 6:14 pm
Reader comment "I have just read the artical on the dyed fish and have to say I think its a despicable practise. As is the pracise of changing the natural formation of fish. But one has to remember its not only the fish trade that indulges in such practises, it straddles many species of animal life and is a despicable practise. I have to agree with the readers comment that we would'nt do it to our children so why make the animal world suffer simply because we can't be satisfied with mother natures concept of how our fish should look in shape and colouration. "
Posted by: Zara Browning - 2 years, 5 months ago
Date: Friday July 14th, 2006, 12:32 pm
Reader comment "i want a green one!!
but i agree, its cruel and wrong, leave them as they were when they were born!
its just like chopping someones leg off with no needle to numb the pain, poor fish. "
Posted by: Sarah Fellowes - 1 year, 3 months ago
Date: Thursday September 20th, 2007, 9:40 am
Reader comment "The practise of dyeing fish is a disgraceful one that I have personally (thankfully) not seen firsthand. I can't imagine how anybody could take a pair of scissors to a living fish and cut its tail off. I have had to do something similar, removing a few rays of a fish's tail, to cure a very rampant form of finrot and when I saw what the fish went through - even though I used anaesthetic and did my best to reduce the fish's suffering - I cannot imagine how anybody could cut off the whole tail. How can anyone think that fish look better when they cannot swim?
This is no different to docking horses, docking and cropping dogs, etc. I hope that such barbaric practises continue to become less and less acceptable."
Posted by: Laura Leighton - 3 months ago
Date: Thursday September 18th, 2008, 12:28 pm
Please login to leave a comment
Login
Please login using your current username and password. If you have forgotten your details you can get a reminder. UsernamePasswordForgotten your password?Keep me signed in
Magazine publishes guide to cosmetic fish surgery
Tail-less Flowerhorns and Parrots are produced with scissors, not selectively bred as previously believed.
A Singapore aquarium magazine has published an article which shows how cosmetic surgery can be performed on pet fish by amputating their tails and injecting them with dyes.
The article published in Chinese in Fish Love Magazine, provides a step-by-step guide to producing a tail-less Flowerhorn cichlid using a pair of scissors and some antibiotics, and offers details on how to produce dyed Parrot cichlids using a hypodermic needle and some food colouring.
Prior to its publication there had been no direct evidence that the tail-less flowerhorn cichlids or heart parrots sometimes sold in the UK were produced by tail amputation, or that the widely available parrot cichlids with a solid body colour derived the colouration from dye injections.
"Post-transformation. Voila! Isn't it dazzling? This shows that fishes too need to spice up their lives with some colour!"
The article describes fish cosmetic surgery as a "bold and creative concept". It suggests that the processes involved in cosmetic fish surgery are less invasive than those used by Michael Jackson: "Compared to Michael's 'brave deeds', to perform tail reconstruction surgery on blood parrots and flowerhorns would only be a small molehill compared to the Himalayas", the article says.
"Many have shown great and grave concern over the issues of 'pet cosmetic surgery'. What we have observed is: Despite countless protests and efforts by SPCA and other animal-loving organisation and support-groups, such surgical processes are still be carried out equally, if not more rampantly. These fishes that had undergone the 'facelift' operations command a much higher premium than the normal fishes which have not."
Tail amputation
In a gruesome sequence of images, a small Flowerhorn cichlid is shown having its tail amputated with a pair of scissors, apparently without an anaesthetic. The wound is then cleaned, and the now tail-less fish is pictured in an aquarium dosed with an anti-bacterial medication to prevent the wound becoming infected.
The translated captions read: "The fishes are carefully selected, usually between 1-1.5" in length, when the caudal fin rays have not fully developed or hardened. Position the scissors or abrasive tool on the spot where the incision is to be made and make a decision to snip! Select a spot which is slightly past the caudal peduncle for the incision so as not to damage the main body of the fish. Apply a generous amount of 'anti-inflammation' medication to minimise bacterial infection."
The article then advises not keeping fishes with their "tails snipped" in community tanks with fishes that have not undergone the process. It goes on: "To be on the safe side, fishes that have undergone the operation should be first kept in a tank containing antibiotics and anti-bacterial medication.
"Fishes that had undergone the surgical removal of their tails should be monitored closely then after. It would take approximately two weeks for the wounds to heal effectively."
Dye your own fish
There has been a great deal of speculation about the methods in which dyed parrot cichlids are produced. Evidence from the fisheries industry has shown that certain dyes can be taken up when fish are held in a dye solution over an extended period, and this was widely believed to be the method in which coloured parrot cichlids were being produced.
"Parrot cichlids are actually produced in a similar manner to other dyed fishes, using multiple injections..."
Others have speculated that Parrot cichlids are dipped in a chemical to remove their mucus and then have a dye applied directly to their skin. There is, however, no evidence to support this theory.The article provides evidence to show that the Parrot cichlids are actually produced in a similar manner to other dyed fishes, using multiple injections of food colouring from a hypodermic needle.
The translated picture captions read: "Just as people would have their eye-lids done, fishes can also be made more appealing. But instead of the surgical scalpel, all can be done with a simple needle.
"Essential tools for the transformation - syringes, food dyes and disposable gloves. It would take about a day or so for the injected dyes to spread to the desired portion. Injected fishes should not be kept with plecos. The latter would suck and 'feast' on the food colouring.
"Before the transformation the fish looks lively and active. For the first few hours after colour injection, the fish might appear lethargic and listless. Not to worry! It would revive to its bubbly old self in a day's time."
"Post-transformation. Voila! Isn't it dazzling? This shows that fishes too need to spice up their lives with some colour!"
The photographs taken during the course of dye injections show that the dye has been injected in a line above the fish's lateral line. The pigment soon spreads to cover much of the flanks of the fish producing a solid colour which still has a slightly darker line of dye where the pigment was injected.
Legal in the UK
Defra and the RSPCA confirmed to Practical Fishkeeping that the process of dyeing fish using these techniques could possibly constitute mutilation under the Bill, and a prosecution could be undertaken as a result if the fish were being mistreated in this country.
No anaesthetic is mentioned in the DIY guide to cosmetic fish surgery.
Dyed Parrot cichlids are one of the most widely sold dyed fishes in the UK. Heart parrots, which have had their tails cut off, are also seen occassionally.
However, a loophole in the forthcoming Animal Welfare Bill means that it will not be illegal to import fishes mutilated overseas.
Practical Fishkeeping has been running a successful campaign against the sale of dyed fish since 1996 and around 75% of the UK's aquatic retailers have signed a pledge saying that they will not stock fish that have been mutilated in this way.
New varieties of dyed fish are appearing with increasing regularity. In February 2006 we reported that a Hong Kong based aquarium company was offering a service in which it would tattoo words, logos or patterns upon the flanks of fish using a laser.
You can find more details on the dyed fish trade in our FAQ on dyed fish.
The Ornamental Aquatic Trade Association told Practical Fishkeeping that it does not recommend that any of its members trade in these fish.
Fish Love magazine declined to comment.
This article may not be reproduced without permission.
Matt Clarke: Mon June 12, 2006, 8:37 amMatt Clarke: 12.6.2006
More: Dyed Fish Campaign
Views: Read 25,577 times
Posted by: Carole Jones - 2 years, 5 months ago
Date: Thursday July 13th, 2006, 6:14 pm
Reader comment "I have just read the artical on the dyed fish and have to say I think its a despicable practise. As is the pracise of changing the natural formation of fish. But one has to remember its not only the fish trade that indulges in such practises, it straddles many species of animal life and is a despicable practise. I have to agree with the readers comment that we would'nt do it to our children so why make the animal world suffer simply because we can't be satisfied with mother natures concept of how our fish should look in shape and colouration. "
Posted by: Zara Browning - 2 years, 5 months ago
Date: Friday July 14th, 2006, 12:32 pm
Reader comment "i want a green one!!
but i agree, its cruel and wrong, leave them as they were when they were born!
its just like chopping someones leg off with no needle to numb the pain, poor fish. "
Posted by: Sarah Fellowes - 1 year, 3 months ago
Date: Thursday September 20th, 2007, 9:40 am
Reader comment "The practise of dyeing fish is a disgraceful one that I have personally (thankfully) not seen firsthand. I can't imagine how anybody could take a pair of scissors to a living fish and cut its tail off. I have had to do something similar, removing a few rays of a fish's tail, to cure a very rampant form of finrot and when I saw what the fish went through - even though I used anaesthetic and did my best to reduce the fish's suffering - I cannot imagine how anybody could cut off the whole tail. How can anyone think that fish look better when they cannot swim?
This is no different to docking horses, docking and cropping dogs, etc. I hope that such barbaric practises continue to become less and less acceptable."
Posted by: Laura Leighton - 3 months ago
Date: Thursday September 18th, 2008, 12:28 pm
Please login to leave a comment
Login
Please login using your current username and password. If you have forgotten your details you can get a reminder. UsernamePasswordForgotten your password?Keep me signed in
