Sounds like the sump is great but more work and more potential for failure. With 6 fish or less in 300gallons it seems like a sump is more overkill than 2 legit canisters. Has anyone really had terrible results from two FX6's??? Ahhh
Wether the combo or lone eheim is expressive or not is irrelevant. What i am saying is the eheim out performed the fx6 which had the help of an ac110. Asides from the eheim having more flow the fx6 is riddled withe bypass and if you follow the manufacturers recommendations how much bio does this filter actually hold?I understood perfectly. There was nothing wrong with your explanation. You were comparing FX6 plus a small filter to an Eheim 2622. I quoted that because neither combo is excessive filtration. The Eheim has quite the flow I agree....Regardless, as you mentioned, you had no problem with water quality when using cannisters....
I currently have 3 canister filters, 20l each, total 60 litres. I can surely squeeze 30l ofmedia amongst them.....As I said, its the extra water volume that matters, the media is plenty in either scenario and extra water volume can be achieved with a larger tank and less fish.
That's exactly the picture I was looking at.
I would do some research on those fish. Discus should be kept in groups of six or more, and shouldn't be kept with fish that can stress them out, the arowana.If I'm only keeping one Arowana, four discus and potentially a ray; am I really going to have bad water quality and clarity with two FX6's and a solid water change regiment. As long as I'm on top of cleaning the canisters (which is simple as unlatching the top and pulling out a basket) how can I go wrong? I was told I was going to be almost over filtering when I bought them now you guys are scaring the **** out of me.
Im not trying to sway you because i like sumps just think if you post the question in the set up amd filtration section you will get an overwhelming support for sumps. Lots of ray amd aro keepers frequent that section.Sounds like the sump is great but more work and more potential for failure. With 6 fish or less in 300gallons it seems like a sump is more overkill than 2 legit canisters. Has anyone really had terrible results from two FX6's??? Ahhh
**** it im getting a sump I hate you guys. Once and for all what is your opinion on the best way to set up the actual intake outake so it's least visible in the tank but still effective?Also if your dead set on filters i'd much rather go with a 2262. Holds more bio and 0 bypass. Dirty water has to hit all levels of filtration
No, no, you should go canisters...;-) j/k**** it im getting a sump I hate you guys. Once and for all what is your opinion on the best way to set up the actual intake outake so it's least visible in the tank but still effective?