For those of you that own one or both, which do you feel if better and why? This will be going on a moderatley stocked 75 gallon tank.....Thx in advance....
This may be true, but as far as budgeting they are a similar price. Looking at the specs, and I know they can be misleading...WyldFya;1444430; said:Really both are good filters, but comparing the two is difficult. The equivalent model in eheim would be the 2028. Personally, I prefer eheim.
Sounds like one is more efficient than the other, it also could be marketing hype... Almost like published printer speeds,how many pages per second? it's all bulls#$@Scottfree;1445937; said:I don't understand how the 2217 should be for a 135g and the 360 for 100g, the 360 has approx 13 liters of media cap, vs 6, and a stronger flow 360 vs 265.
Price is the worst thing to compare filters by. The eheim can do more for a few reasons. One the media has far more surface area than the marineland media, second, for biological filtration, slower flow rates create longer contact times with the media, causing better filtration.Scottfree;1445937;1445937 said:This may be true, but as far as budgeting they are a similar price. Looking at the specs, and I know they can be misleading...
GFPH Aq size Can H Can Diam Media Cap Inlet Outlet Watts
360 360 100g 17" 13 3/4 x 7 3/4" 3.4 Gal 5/8" 5/8" 35
2217 265 135g 15" 7" 6 liter 5/8" 1/2" 20
I don't understand how the 2217 should be for a 135g and the 360 for 100g, the 360 has approx 13 liters of media cap, vs 6, and a stronger flow 360 vs 265.