It is my understanding that the fish labelled Honduran red points that come out of Rio monga look like this
While the ones that come out of Rio danli look like this
It is also my understanding that the 'true' Honduran red points are endemic to Rio danli.
So I would conclude that the taller bodied, larger, duller (more convict or siquia like) Rio mongas would be classed as false Honduran red points and are probably some sort of siquia var, while the slimmer, brighter, and smaller Rio danlis would be labelled as true Honduran red points and classed as their own species.
Would this be correct? Just trying to clear up some confusion on my part and whoever comes up to this dilemma in the future. I'm still trying to figure out if I have real or false Honduran red points. Mine look more like the ones coming out of Rio monga, but either way they're beautiful fish and I'm happy with them.
While the ones that come out of Rio danli look like this
It is also my understanding that the 'true' Honduran red points are endemic to Rio danli.
So I would conclude that the taller bodied, larger, duller (more convict or siquia like) Rio mongas would be classed as false Honduran red points and are probably some sort of siquia var, while the slimmer, brighter, and smaller Rio danlis would be labelled as true Honduran red points and classed as their own species.
Would this be correct? Just trying to clear up some confusion on my part and whoever comes up to this dilemma in the future. I'm still trying to figure out if I have real or false Honduran red points. Mine look more like the ones coming out of Rio monga, but either way they're beautiful fish and I'm happy with them.