Feed fish raw shrimp or cooked?

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
jaysonabrego;3890671; said:
Fish are able to digest cooked food easier therefore extrac more nutriets. Remember, fish in the wild eat raw shrimp so ofcourse that is an option too.

Maybe they can digest cooked food easier,I have never heard of this, but most of the nutrition is destroyed once the food has been cooked.
 
Raw with no preservatives thawed in garlic powder
 
stupidest thing ive ever heard if the cooked version lost all it's nutritional value that means us as humans would also die from eating cooked food because we would reap no benefit . there is absolutely no difference between the 2 it's a scientific proven fact if you think otherwise take a nutrition or chemistry class
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cichlids&bichirs
stupidest thing ive ever heard if the cooked version lost all it's nutritional value that means us as humans would also die from eating cooked food because we would reap no benefit . there is absolutely no difference between the 2 it's a scientific proven fact if you think otherwise take a nutrition or chemistry class
So since you've decided to rebut and bump this thread from ten years ago,where is your proof that supports your position?
 
all cooked and boiled food loses it's nutritional value LMAO !!!! JESUS CHRIST ITS COMMON SENSE
 
Apparently because when you cook food it automatically turns to worthless crap according to you pompous pretentious fools
Clown,you come out of nowhere bumping old ass threads like you are doing somebody a favor.You cant tell me or probably nobody else on here anything about the subject that we don't already know....Stop quoting me,learn how to spell properly and take your childish crap somewhere else.
 
1598563934298.png
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com