As for updates on the conservation of the ‘extinct’ fish, I have some interesting anecdotal updates from a few natives from Indonesia I have come across.
supposedly research has to be authorized by the government in these areas, keep this in mind. This also relates back to my earlier statement from the museum curator that told me they were unable to genetically test their specimen they found. As far as I am aware, it is illegal to research without authorization/warrant. May make things difficult on the Asian front…
now for the anecdotal details: from discussing with a few people, including Jeff Rapps, it seems that Chitala lopis slipping through the cracks is more likely than another Indonesian chitala species being imported. I have concluded this as Borneo and Sumatra are heavily restricted as for tropical fish exports…Java on the other hand does not seem to share this strict manner. I have talked to one native to the island that claims they still catch and export fish from the island. The shipment came from Indonesia itself, the fish could very well be from Java. This could also explain why the specimens here on MFK all appear very similar, with the ‘lopis’ traits…My specimen looks near identical to a supposed Java caught specimen kept at Dunia air Tawar. This specimen was unfortunately denied genetic testing, I’m unsure if it is being stored anywhere.
this is really just spitballing theories as this can all be solved when testing is done and fish is larger. There was also rumor of a 4th continental chitala in one of the last papers written about Lopis, it was unnamed but referred to being found on Malay peninsula.
Other things of note are that this paper has anecdotal evidence of C. lopis being caught for Java aquarium trade. Merely just rumored to still be exported by the fishermen. The paper is rather old though, doesn’t provide very much in that regard.
Here is said paper:
Paper