Ammonia still in water after cycling

Disturbed.)

Plecostomus
MFK Member
Wouldn’t it be good if they could come up with something more like the marine test kits that you add reagent 1 to which turns it blue and then add reagent 2 till it goes red and then measure on a scale. But again , these aren’t for ph or ammonia.
They do
 

Trouser Cough

Aimara
MFK Member
Nov 7, 2022
895
1,013
134
You can test if ammonia is way too high. 0.25ppm should not be an issue to almost anybody. Fish don't need as much food as you think. You can tell if they are losing weight and adjust.
There's a teaching moment in here somewhere and I'd like to be teached.

I've been monitoring NH3 > NO2 > NO3 off and on for somewhere around 50 years but I've also harbored what may be a misconception and I infer that from some that post messages like the one shown above.

My understanding has been that Ammonia is a byproduct of metabolism and a component of urine.

Ammonia breaks down through bacterial action and becomes NO2

...which further becomes NO3 which can be taken up by plants.

When I read threads like this one though I infer that ammonia is a result of overfeeding.

What specifically is the origin of ammonia and why is overfeeding referenced more often than that it's simply a metabolite?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redshark1

Fishman Dave

Potamotrygon
MFK Member
Nov 14, 2015
2,105
4,301
164
53
West Yorkshire
There's a teaching moment in here somewhere and I'd like to be teached.

I've been monitoring NH3 > NO2 > NO3 off and on for somewhere around 50 years but I've also harbored what may be a misconception and I infer that from some that post messages like the one shown above.

My understanding has been that Ammonia is a byproduct of metabolism and a component of urine.

Ammonia breaks down through bacterial action and becomes NO2

...which further becomes NO3 which can be taken up by plants.

When I read threads like this one though I infer that ammonia is a result of overfeeding.

What specifically is the origin of ammonia and why is overfeeding referenced more often than that it's simply a metabolite?
So, yes and no and yes!

ammonia and ammonium in a fish tank are a byproduct of waste.
Where that waste comes from depends heavily on the actions of the fish keeper

in a lightly stocked, correctly fed tank the ammonia generally comes from fish waste (poo, pee).
even in a heavily stocked correctly fed tank this is still the case.

however, in a lightly stocked over fed tank or just an over fed tank, the ammonia comes both from the fish waste ( poo, pee) but also from the decaying remains of food.
this food decays at different rates depending on different factors, temp, ph, type of food, etc. etc. but generally not as fast as it goes through a fish and out the other end.
so, decaying food can have an effect on a tank long after a fish has eaten and excreted.

over my many years in the hobby I have been told lots of methods of cycling a tank.
The most bizarre one, being to set the tank up exactly how you want it but with the exception of fish. Then feed the tank daily as you would with fish in (but sparingly).
This seems bizarre but a) it trains the young person to feed the tank both daily and sparingly in a routine, b)it allows them to do a water change routine but between the two points, c) the decaying food produces ammonia for the filter to cycle the tank.
a clever but somewhat unnecessary or unused way nowadays.

over the years much information gets lost or mitransferred. Like the idea of transferring gravel to seed a tank. This used to be a great way of doing things WHEN WE HAD undergravel filters. Less so now that we don’t!

So the answer is to feed the correct amount the fish can eat.

Ammonia often changes to ammonium and back in a tank depending on ph and temperature.
this change is somewhat irrelevant as test kits measure the combined effect of both


as for any reading on an ammonia test.
This is an indication that the filter bacteria is not working correctly which also could mean tank not cycled.

so even low readings should be actioned.

since different fish have different tolerances for ammonia some could be ok, but some more delicate species, not so.
 

Redshark1

Peacock Bass
MFK Member
Oct 18, 2017
224
582
115
62
Leeds, West Yorkshire, England
All biological processes that involve the breakdown of organic matter produce ammonia.

Since ammonia production and testing takes place in the water you will always register some ammonia because it is impossible for it to be filtered out instantly.

Ammonia in an aquarium exists in two forms in equilibrium. Free ammonia (very toxic) and ammonium (much less toxic). The two forms together are called Total Ammonia. For your specific pH and temperature there will be a point where Total Ammonia begins to be harmful. For my aquarium this point is 2.5ppm. Luckily I am able to keep my Total Ammonia at or below 0.25ppm.

There are helpful charts which enable you to look up your figure.

Ammonia Toxicity at 0.25 and 0.5 TAN.jpg

Ammonia Toxicity at 1.0 and 2.0 TAN.jpg

Ammonia Toxicity at 4.0 TAN.jpg
 

duanes

MFK Moderators
Staff member
Moderator
MFK Member
Jun 7, 2007
21,468
27,350
2,910
Isla Taboga Panama via Milwaukee
One thing not often understood.
Ammonia is "not only a product" of food waste ,excreted in solid waste, and urine thru a pore near the anus.
It is also excreted thru the gills.
Every time water is taken in, and excreted thru the gills, beside the CO2, ammonia is also expelled.
The gill membrane is similar to the alveoli in human lungs.
And high levels of nitrate, can interfere with that function (like tar and other toxins in cigarettes).
 
Last edited:

Trouser Cough

Aimara
MFK Member
Nov 7, 2022
895
1,013
134
Interesting. Is that pore a ureter or is it that that specific area has pores capable of excreting urine? I had always thought the transfer took place exclusively at the gills and that fish did not have ureter... probably from learning about shark anatomy many years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leonardo_CH
zoomed.com
hikariusa.com
aqaimports.com
Store