Bristlenose Plecos

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
So, I got curious: As I learned, Rudolph Kner first described Ancistrus dolichopterus in 1854 (actually, it was presented at a meeting on March 3, 1853): https://archive.org/details/diehypostomidenz00kner/page/n1/mode/2up
He prefaced his section on A. dolichopterus by saying that the species looks remarkably like A. cirrhosus and they could just be "varieties" of each other. A. cirrhosus was first described in field notes by the brothers Joseph and Johann Natterer. Their last name makes the heart of every one of us who has kept piranhas, beat a little faster. Natterer described A. cirrhosus body, belly, and fins as "very dark olive-brown or black-brown with tiny, bright yellow dots that are tightly together." "Fin colors are borderlining on violett". Natterer found the fish in Rio braneo und Rio Guapore in Matogrosso. A male was 6.3'' (body without tailfin), the smallest female was 3.5''

Regardless Kner's prior statement that A. dolichopterus resembles A. cirrhosus, Kner describes A. dolichopterus as "homogeneously brown, with breast and belly in a lighter brown with brown dots. Only the male shows tiny lighter dots in the center, the entire belly, head, back, and tail". He found the fish at Barra do Rio negro. The fish were between 4-5''.

A. dolichopterus (holotype)
1741227758180.png


Sonia Fisch-Muller then reinvestigated for her 1999 dissertation (Systématique du genre Ancistrus Kner (Teleostei, Loricariidae): approches morphologique et génétique. Université de Genève), and based on morphology and genetics she renamed them. The dissertation was never published, which brings this to a cold end. Until she publsihed in the Check List of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America by Roberto E. Reis in 2003, but I can't seem to find any additional insights there.

FWIW, neither Natterer not Kner nor Fisch-Muller said anything about the white seams on dorsal and tail fin.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service published this as recent as 2018, and they have read and cite Fisch-Muller's work.

1741229613400.png

Certainly a lot of uncertainty here
I wished Kner and the Natterers had had color photography - then we'd know for sure
 
  • Like
Reactions: Milingu
Interesting read.
But I would not give too much about the colour description since the speciems were kept in alcohol for a while before beeing used for the description. Kner depends on Natterer's description if availiable. Kner does not mention any notes from Kner in the description of A. dolichopterus. In addition to the colour altering alcohol, living A. dolichoperus already fade with age and lose the pitch black juvenile dress.
The important part is the count of the soft rays in the dorsal fin. 8 or more soft rays occur only in the group of the "white seam" Ancistrus and in no other Ancistrus species outside of this group. 9 or more soft rays only occur in A. dolichopterus. Which is widely accepted among ichthyologists.


The picture by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service clearly shows less soft rays and therefore not A. dolichopterus or even a very close relative.
 
Haha, very kind of you! I figured it was a long shot but worth checking. My lfs charges around $20 for little 1" bristlenose. Said no one local is breeding them. Thanks for sharing though, this has been an interesting read.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com