No, YOU do the work and quote my words where I insulted him. I'm done with this horse****.You can start by clicking the award under his name. A brief skim of his posts would sate most after that.
Just like I did, direct quote, word for word. Ok?
No, YOU do the work and quote my words where I insulted him. I'm done with this horse****.You can start by clicking the award under his name. A brief skim of his posts would sate most after that.
Suggesting his like count is indicative of the people who listen to his advice. This to me says that he posts a lot of hot air and people don't appreciate any advice he gives. Then you suggest he is purposefully insulting people or trolling, when anyone with eyes could entertain the possibility that perhaps he was a pure cichlid enthusiast that was hurt by the remarks. That didn't happen however as you directly insult him and any advice he has given in his entire post history. It's your job as the scholar to research until your satisfied. Feel free to prove me wrong but neither of us really expect eachother to spend hours on this petty argument.I got a good little chuckle out of that
Why do you even care? The guy has over 5,500 posts and 57 "Likes". How many people do you think are listening to advice from him with those stats? Not to mention he purposely comes to the thread to troll it and insult people, then pretends to be an upstanding citizen and say "Oh yea, well this thread is getting off-topic". 1 "Like" for every HUNDRED posts.....
Gee, I wonder why.
Dude, OMG, he sounded like a biased windbag. Are you happy now? You're driving me crazy. The whole POINT of these past 4 pages is "NO ONE WANTS TO LISTEN TO SOMEONE WHO COMES OFF AS A D-BAG." You just don't friggin get it, do you???!!!Suggesting his like count is indicative of the people who listen to his advice. This to me says that he posts a lot of hot air and people don't appreciate any advice he gives. Then you suggest he is purposefully insulting people or trolling, when anyone with eyes could entertain the possibility that perhaps he was a pure cichlid enthusiast that was hurt by the remarks. That didn't happen however as you directly insult him and any advice he has given in his entire post history. It's your job as the scholar to research until your satisfied. Feel free to prove me wrong but neither of us really expect eachother to spend hours on this petty argument.
What are you talking about and why do I feel like I'm talking to a 10th grader?? Grammar?? What?Not yet. I'll say two things. You know you should bow out of an arguement when you have to pick apart grammar or play the victim. Have a nice day Frank.
I think you missed that. Dummy informed Frank of things he should have learned in grade school. So Frank then later commented on how he spelled "you're" wrong. It was very fitting.Not yet. I'll say two things. You know you should bow out of an arguement when you have to pick apart grammar or play the victim. Have a nice day Frank.
I think you missed that. Dummy informed Frank of things he should have learned in grade school. So Frank then later commented on how he spelled "you're" wrong. It was very fitting.
I should have been less vague with my postYou're***
Clearly you learned nothing in primary school kiddo. Done with you. Don't quote my message you got an issue PM me.
I did???????.......I think you missed that. Dummy informed Frank of things he should have learned in grade school. So Frank then later commented on how he spelled "you're" wrong. It was very fitting.