HR 669 : CONGRESSIONAL HEARING BANNING NONNATIVE SPECIES APRIL 23, 2009 ACTION NEEDED

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
I emailed Bob Fenner of Wet Web Media.com about this bill. He had not heard of it! Seems like he is very concerned about it.

Since he is a "big gun" in this hobby maybe he can get the word out to the other big names and get something done about this!
 
what I posted at WW:

My point there was that this problem is largely because we haven't been able to keep our irresponsible fish keepers in line. I think other sites are terrible at not lambasting members for illegal pet ownership. There's plenty of wink-wink or turn-the-other-way things going on.

I have to give Jesse and many others here credit for things like the extension of the posts covering laws in different states. Also, posts of illegal transactions or ideas dont last long here as well.


While it's important to stand up against this bill now... it's also important to:

1. discuss all sides (DONT censor folks that think we 'deserved it' or 'should care more about natives', etc.)

2. be vigilant about keeping bad hobbyists from ruining things

3. point out how little of the invasives are actually from hobbyists, and try to lobby against improperly run fish farms or government agencies (*COUGH*FLORIDA*COUGH*) that do things like introduce invasives intentionally (cough*p-bass*cough). We're a minority as far as impacting things, but these Rio Grande cichlids and apple snails in Louisiana are very likely from hobbyists. Also, even though we're a minority, we will be the ones that suffer if something like this passes

4. educate ourselves and others. Know about ecosystems, know about invasives, know about avenues of prevention and education


I could go on and on, but I think you get the idea. It's fine to fight this bill, but we need to be a little more pro-active from now on to keep this a healthy and moral hobby.
 
Hello All,

We have worked very hard to try and simplify the fight against HR 669, which is the Legislation to Ban Virtually ALL Non-Native Pets.

This means all non-native mammals, birds, reptiles, and tropical fish currently being kept as pets.

Time is of the essence, there is a Congressional Hearing concerning this Legislation on April 23, 2009 which is almost here already!

Please open the link below. Copy it, change it, link it to your own web-site, do whatever it takes…then forward it to as many people as you can.

Remember to contact the appropriate elected officials with your thoughts…do NOT expect everyone else to do this for you.

http://www.scserp.com/SCS_Legislation_Federal_H.R.%20669.htm

Thank You All Very Much
 
Acestro;2985106; said:
what I posted at WW:

My point there was that this problem is largely because we haven't been able to keep our irresponsible fish keepers in line. I think other sites are terrible at not lambasting members for illegal pet ownership. There's plenty of wink-wink or turn-the-other-way things going on.

I have to give Jesse and many others here credit for things like the extension of the posts covering laws in different states. Also, posts of illegal transactions or ideas dont last long here as well.


While it's important to stand up against this bill now... it's also important to:

1. discuss all sides (DONT censor folks that think we 'deserved it' or 'should care more about natives', etc.)

2. be vigilant about keeping bad hobbyists from ruining things

3. point out how little of the invasives are actually from hobbyists, and try to lobby against improperly run fish farms or government agencies (*COUGH*FLORIDA*COUGH*) that do things like introduce invasives intentionally (cough*p-bass*cough). We're a minority as far as impacting things, but these Rio Grande cichlids and apple snails in Louisiana are very likely from hobbyists. Also, even though we're a minority, we will be the ones that suffer if something like this passes

4. educate ourselves and others. Know about ecosystems, know about invasives, know about avenues of prevention and education


I could go on and on, but I think you get the idea. It's fine to fight this bill, but we need to be a little more pro-active from now on to keep this a healthy and moral hobby.

Your post was deleted because you quoted a post by a member who has it in for this site. I agree that hobbyists are to blame for the current situation, but this site has always discouraged the release of any aquarium fish, whether native or non-native into local waterways. We also do not allow the sale or transfer of illegal fish on this site. If a member wishes to post a picture of their illegal fish, they are responsible for the consequences. This bill affects all fishkeepers, responsible and otherwise.
 
I joined the FaceBook group and yes I will fax my opinions!!! I just got a 55 gallon tank in December and I have 12 African Cichlids that by the sounds of the bill would be really hard to get if it passes!!!

FRIKKEN GOVERNMENT!

Thank you for sending me the private message!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
ewurm;2989916; said:
Your post was deleted because you quoted a post by a member who has it in for this site. I agree that hobbyists are to blame for the current situation, but this site has always discouraged the release of any aquarium fish, whether native or non-native into local waterways. We also do not allow the sale or transfer of illegal fish on this site. If a member wishes to post a picture of their illegal fish, they are responsible for the consequences. This bill affects all fishkeepers, responsible and otherwise.

Cool, thank you for the explanation. :)
 
ewurm;2989916; said:
Your post was deleted because you quoted a post by a member who has it in for this site.


I know the never ending battle at hand between the various mega sites.....but one guy having it "in for this site"? That's grounds for deleting something he said?

The discussion aside for a second....that's totally ridiculous.

I know....you hold the "big hammer" and can moderate as you see fit.

Whatever. Have a great day.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com