TATTON said:I dont wanna look like the bad guy here but the picture thats winning is in a photographers point of view, unfocused, lacks composition, colours could be better i really dont understand unless everyones just voting for the one thats winning
I'm not saying that you have to be a photographer but their are better shots in this competition that haven't got half as many votes as the one thats winning. Its baffled me I just dont understand thats all.Steve_89 said:You have to remember that we arn't all pro photographers
Can we expect something brilliant from you next month? Thats if you can do better...
rallysman said:I've come to the conclusion that actual quality and subject doesnt matter
Its "photo" of the month not "Fish" of the monthrasdbo said:i don't know whats wrong with everybody else, but the winning pic of the albino peacock bass is off the hook , but yes background and content do help. i look at color and type of fish and if that snakehead would have been sideways to show color it might have gotten more votes.
i say this to say : RESPECT EVERYBODY'S CHOICE AND ENJOY THE PHOTO'S!!!!!
P.S. THESE LOOK GREAT ALSO FOR FISH OR COLOR OR RARITY: NUMBERS 31,29,28,23,21,19,17
rallysman said:Its "photo" of the month not "Fish" of the month