Putting a fishprofiles page against a peer reviewed journal article is hardly proof. Especially when it contains obvious errors (they don't occur in lakes, they grow bigger than 90cm, hell the pic isn't even right). Here's what I know as someone who lives in the area where these eels are found, observed and caught them in the wild and has visited and talked to the scientists working on them and seen them in their aquariums. They occur in the same creek and river environments as other catadromous "freshwater" fish such as Lates calcarifer, Kuhlia rupestris, K. marginata, Anguilla reinhardtii, Stiphodon sp., Giurus margaritacea etc. While it is highly likely that they are catadromous, they are fully capable of living as adults in full fresh without the need for the addition of salt. For all intents and purposes this makes them a freshwater fish as far as hobbyists are concerned unless they are interested in attempting breeding them. As I have previously said, the next step in the research is otolith banding to see how much time, if any, is spent in brackish or marine environments and at which stage of the life cycle as well as tagging and tracking adults in their creeks. Until that research is finished and published...