Common Houseplants in aqarium, the list!

JsTO97

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Sep 6, 2024
22
14
3
40
40-50% every week. Every tank is filtering at minimum 10 turnovers/hour. My goal is to always keep nitrates below 40; or 20 in the stingray tank
Yeah my nitrates floats around 20 for the past week , so I’m not sure if I should keep on going and letting it go or swap water out. Trying to see who keeps their WC minimally if the plants are keeping nitrates low.
 

esoxlucius

Balaclava Bot Butcher
MFK Member
Dec 30, 2015
3,925
15,052
194
UK
With such heavily planted tanks, do you guys even bother with water changes? If so, how less often do you guys do it ?
It's not all about nitrate.

My little planted hex tank has been a fantastic experiment for me over the past 12 months since I set it up.

I've had salvinia, frogbit and algae in there, but also a few small terrestrial plants too, and they've all thrived.

Once they became established my nitrate reading was always a consistent 0ppm. Great, I don't need to do anymore water changes now I've mastered the dreaded nitrate issue. Wrong!!

There are numerous trace elements in water and these elements are needed by the whole "ecosystem" within your aquarium. It's good practice to still do partial water changes to replenish these elements.
 

duanes

MFK Moderators
Staff member
Moderator
MFK Member
Jun 7, 2007
21,492
27,397
2,910
Isla Taboga Panama via Milwaukee
To me nitrates are an indicator chemical species, and it is one of the few we can easilly test for., and why is so significant.
And although I try to hold nitrates at below 5 ppm with heavy plantings, I do not forgo water changes.
Where I collect cichlids in nature I never detect any nitrates, so thats where I want my tanks to have.
IMG_2214.jpeg
IMG_4753.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: OTp1144

JsTO97

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Sep 6, 2024
22
14
3
40
It's not all about nitrate.

My little planted hex tank has been a fantastic experiment for me over the past 12 months since I set it up.

I've had salvinia, frogbit and algae in there, but also a few small terrestrial plants too, and they've all thrived.

Once they became established my nitrate reading was always a consistent 0ppm. Great, I don't need to do anymore water changes now I've mastered the dreaded nitrate issue. Wrong!!

There are numerous trace elements in water and these elements are needed by the whole "ecosystem" within your aquarium. It's good practice to still do partial water changes to replenish these elements.

Oh totally. There’s other trace elements needed by the fish, but I guess I was more wondering what would be a sweet spot to try and recreate an ecosystem that requires much less water changes, both to replenish trace elements ( or this is done through feedings) and reduce toxic build up of chemicals that plants can’t take up.
 

Joseppe

Jack Dempsey
MFK Member
Feb 8, 2019
60
70
36
28
Belgium
Oh totally. There’s other trace elements needed by the fish, but I guess I was more wondering what would be a sweet spot to try and recreate an ecosystem that requires much less water changes, both to replenish trace elements ( or this is done through feedings) and reduce toxic build up of chemicals that plants can’t take up.
I ran one tank waterchangeless for 1.5 years (thought i did add new water by topping it off, i never drained any out though) So it's not 100% recycling all the water and the only thing i tested for was nitrate. Which also consistantly was undetectable after a few months of that tank establishing. Truly waterchangeless would be impossible is my best guess. I'm also sure problems would start appearing after 2 years or more. 1.5 Years was not long enough for a proper test imo. Fish stayed healthy and thrived during the time though. Never seen any issue whatsoever, no known deaths either. Thought i lost a few fish in there but when i took it down i surprisingly found every single fish i ever added in there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: esoxlucius

esoxlucius

Balaclava Bot Butcher
MFK Member
Dec 30, 2015
3,925
15,052
194
UK
The only extra water my little hex tank receives is from top up through evaporation. It's not a lot but enough to replenish some of the lost elements/nutrients. And the tank is thriving, crystal clear water showing constant 0ppm nitrate.

If it had a tight fitting lid on, which I can't possibly do because of the plants, then I wouldn't have to top it up at all. In that scenario I'm not sure what would happen long term. Would the balance still be ok or would part of the ecosystem break down and cause me problems? I honestly don't know the answer.

I just absolutely love this tank and can't wait to set up more smaller tanks when my 360 goes.
IMG_20241105_183043_HDR.jpg
 
  • Love
Reactions: Joseppe

JsTO97

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Sep 6, 2024
22
14
3
40
I ran one tank waterchangeless for 1.5 years (thought i did add new water by topping it off, i never drained any out though) So it's not 100% recycling all the water and the only thing i tested for was nitrate. Which also consistantly was undetectable after a few months of that tank establishing. Truly waterchangeless would be impossible is my best guess. I'm also sure problems would start appearing after 2 years or more. 1.5 Years was not long enough for a proper test imo. Fish stayed healthy and thrived during the time though. Never seen any issue whatsoever, no known deaths either. Thought i lost a few fish in there but when i took it down i surprisingly found every single fish i ever added in there.

Amazing. Yeah that’s what I’m trying to get to. I have one tank that’s running for 3 months with no water changes. It’s 75 gallon planted but I’ve been only keeping 10 mollys and an 18 inche pleco for the first 1.5 months and now, been running with 2 jack Demseys and the pleco for 1 month. No water changes as nitrates hover aroun 10/20 ppm. There have been some brown algae build up.

I will do water changes, but it was more experimenting on how to extend the cycle to like once a month or or two. At only 25 percent.
 

JsTO97

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Sep 6, 2024
22
14
3
40
The only extra water my little hex tank receives is from top up through evaporation. It's not a lot but enough to replenish some of the lost elements/nutrients. And the tank is thriving, crystal clear water showing constant 0ppm nitrate.

If it had a tight fitting lid on, which I can't possibly do because of the plants, then I wouldn't have to top it up at all. In that scenario I'm not sure what would happen long term. Would the balance still be ok or would part of the ecosystem break down and cause me problems? I honestly don't know the answer.

I just absolutely love this tank and can't wait to set up more smaller tanks when my 360 goes.
View attachment 1551755
What plant is that? Love the roots.
 

esoxlucius

Balaclava Bot Butcher
MFK Member
Dec 30, 2015
3,925
15,052
194
UK
What plant is that? Love the roots.
That is a Calathea Vittata. The roots started off quite wimpy and all curled up through being in a pot. They do look quite majestic now.

Root structures of plants are quite fascinating when you see them in all their glory, but of course when the plant is in a pot you never get to see that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AR1
zoomed.com
hikariusa.com
aqaimports.com
Store