It means that the 20 inch specimens recorded in the catalogue of african fishes was senegalus meriodonales and was subsequently reclassed as a sub specie of senegalus. The size is real so is the fish.
You are not following the flow of taught because you did not read the scientific data,but only read Josh's one sentence post on the same,which I also had to point out to you. Hence one sided research leads to confusion and denial as one cant see the whole picture.
.
Amazing how you dont see the logic in this. FISHBASE AND SERIOUSLY DID NOT UPDATE THE SITE WITH THE CORRECT SPECIES. Argue your point till the cows come home. Your embarrassing yourself. Yes there is incorrect information on this site as well. Never said forums were perfect only that i prefer them to care sheets.
Next time you attack someone on a forum.
Haha ever predictable... now he plays the helpless victim, what happened to calling me a bully ? Stop the snowflake act. If your soo insulted use the report feature, i think your very familiar with it.
Regarding freds size chart and my comments. Most of us regulars are aware of turkana sens size and assume that the 20inch wc measurement is acceptable. Is it scientific ? No. does it matter ? Not really because the rest of the chart is correct within reason. Aaaaand if you kept polys and purchased a turkana the 1st thing you would do after opening the box would be to come on here and brag about your turkana sen, then get flooded with replies.
This is complete b.s. man you really are a drama queen. How exactly did i single you out ?Actually, I posted a link to your thread, trying to be helpful. You singled me out, as you've done before, and instead of about Dats, you started talking about polys, asking me to personally explain the "incorrect" info on that link, although I initially didn't say or post anything about polys. Then you blamed me for derailing the Dat thread....This is how I felt anyway.
You posted the link, i thanked you and said i would check it out. Even though i never intended to do so. Trusted members had already chimed in besides seriously fish's inaccurate content is nothing new to me.

These look familiar?





I actually used the report feature on my own comment and requested posts 21 to 30 be removed since an 8 yr old would be reading the thread later that night.
Infact im pretty sure another member politely told you to put a sock in it at some point.

You wanna argue with me on every thread thats fine but please dont resort to lies and not expect to get called out for it.
Last edited: