I have been watching this thread a long time, and resisted jumping in, because to me, the notion that a 250 gallon tank is a "large tank", large enough for many of the fish suggested seems delusional.
To me 250 gallons is maybe large enough for a pair of P-Bass or, a trio of oscars, and nothing else.
Maybe, as mentioned by some, it could be a temporary grow out tank for some species mentioned, but hardly more than that.
And a tank triple that size for some of these cats, would seem minimal a year or 2 down the road.
Many species mentioned will hardly be able to comfortably turn around in a standard 250 gal in a year, and that doesn't even consider work it will take to maintain their water quality needs of such large fish, in such a small system.
Everything is relative when keeping fish healthy is concerned.
Although a 50 gal tank may be a large tank for 25 cardinal tetras to some, a 250 gal tank for more than a couple P-bass, or aforementioned catfish, is barely a puddle.
View attachment Fish.jpeg
To me 250 gallons is maybe large enough for a pair of P-Bass or, a trio of oscars, and nothing else.
Maybe, as mentioned by some, it could be a temporary grow out tank for some species mentioned, but hardly more than that.
And a tank triple that size for some of these cats, would seem minimal a year or 2 down the road.
Many species mentioned will hardly be able to comfortably turn around in a standard 250 gal in a year, and that doesn't even consider work it will take to maintain their water quality needs of such large fish, in such a small system.
Everything is relative when keeping fish healthy is concerned.
Although a 50 gal tank may be a large tank for 25 cardinal tetras to some, a 250 gal tank for more than a couple P-bass, or aforementioned catfish, is barely a puddle.
View attachment Fish.jpeg
Last edited: