High five for long hair! I'd say, cut it for a job, but if it's import enough for you to turn down a job for you, more power to ya'. I will grow my hair until the Zoo I work at tells me to tie it back.
frnchjeep;4417630; said:ay ay ay... I never said it was... to either of your questions. 1st, you are correct. Long hair isn't a religion.Not a tough one to figure out. Long hair is PART of several religions. It is in the eeoc code that it is illegal to discriminate against any part of a religion as long as it doesn't cause undue hardship to the employers operation of business.
2nd. no it is not "CLEARLY not a case of religious discrimination". There is no such thing as clearly in this kind of situation, as I'm sure the employer didn't ask if it was part of a religion, and probably just started rambling about company policy. If this perspective employee decided to claim religious discrimination, the employer would have some explaining to do, and it wouldn't be fun or easy. Thats the type of thing that gets people fired or worse. All i'm saying is it is a very risky move with serious consequences over something as trivial as the physical appearance of your employees.
frnchjeep;4417271; said:Long hair and facial hair is part of some religions.So are piercings and tattoos. Basing employment on such things ( and having the balls to voice it) is a decision that could end you up in some hot water. People have sued and won over way less before.
EDIT: This is right from the EEOC website:
Religious Accommodation/Dress & Grooming Policies
Unless it would be an undue hardship on the employer's operation of its business, an employer must reasonably accommodate an employee's religious beliefs or practices. This applies not only to schedule changes or leave for religious observances, but also to such things as dress or grooming practices that an employee has for religious reasons. These might include, for example, wearing particular head coverings or other religious dress (such as a Jewish yarmulke or a Muslim headscarf), or wearing certain hairstyles or facial hair (such as Rastafarian dreadlocks or Sikh uncut hair and beard). It also includes an employee's observance of a religious prohibition against wearing certain garments (such as pants or miniskirts).
fhawk362;4418902; said:This is true, Disney had a lawsuit over a case such as this, not sure how it concluded to be honest but I know that in the guidelines of disney it now states that specific religion and saw to talk to the person interviewing you about the matter.
I have also read a number of attempted lawsuits by people like me, it seems most all, if not all, have been dismissed. It was stated that it's hard to win a lawsuit over an issue that a judge and jury do not understand, being that most all of them will fit into the part of the short haired business man.
Dan Feller;4418924; said:I have a feeling that Disney doesn't end up the loser in very many lawsuits - it's amazing what a difference a team of high-priced lawyers can make in our legal system...
If you are happy with the job, then congratulations! If the job doesn't turn out so well, I guess your hair will grow back before too long.
fhawk362;4401957; said:I've been looking into the psychology behind it, from what it sounds, and this makes perfect sense to me, is that men with short hair and no facial hair have a more feminine and more submissive look, like a young boy or a female. Men cut their hair to please their superiors by showing them that they are obedient, which takes away from the man's power, making him feel less like a man by being more submissive, just as I feel about it, which is why I've never cut my hair for my girlfriend.
kgby13;4419168; said:I feel the opposite. Have you ever looked at a guy with short hair from behind and said "She looks good"? I haven't, but I have made the mistake with a guy that had long hair.