Hi alcohologist, I have finished my beer, so now I can respond.alcohologist;1923181; said:that looks good, salsa.
what i was wondering, socal discus, is why you chose to have your fuge before your wet/dry?
speaking as one of the "reef people", haha. my sump is simple - skimmer and rock in the first compartment, rock in second compartment, refugium in third, chemicals in fourth, return in fifth. you dont want too many nutrients to get into your fuge - theyre more useful for nitrate-nitrogen gas.
I'll do a little more thinking about it, but my initial idea was that the plants can use actual particulate from the water flow as fertilizer. I think your protein skimmer would pull these out, but they can act as nutrients for the plants. The wet/dry only needs the ammonia and nitrite in the water column to get going. Much of the particulate will settle in the plant chamber (hopefully), and reduce wear on the filter floss.
In a salt system with live rock, I'm not sure if rock=plants here, or if plants=macro algae. I'm just not sure what the process is with salt. This might shed some light on what makes sense to go first.
I know less than very little about how reef systems work, so I am sure there is a reason for putting the fuge later in the system. I have read that often copopods (sp?) etc. are kept and breed in the refugium and actually circulate up to the tank as food, so it would make sense to have the fuge towards the end of the system. Of course, it sounds like they may be getting nuked by the chemical filtration before they make the return in the system. (I'm not sure what chemical filtration would be)
If the wet dry was first, it would have to handle much more mechanical filtration. That and the water level in the fuge can be at the rim almost, but the wet/dry needs 2/3 of the bio material out. If the fuge is first, I can have more total water volume in the system.
Additional conversation tomorrow? As always, feedback on my thoughts is appreciated.
-Eric