E_americanus;4770419; said:even if the sections are repetitive, i would still keep them separate. it would be important to identify them as two separate species. if the sections are lumped together it will just contribute/perpetuate the idea that they are the same. wild specimens do show drastic differences (relatively speaking) between species, but less so in captive specimens (it will be interesting to see how the spots from our project that have gone out to MFK members progress morphologically as they age, in comparison to FLG's).
just my two cents on the issue --
--solomon
got it, how's that spotted gar report coming along? can't wait to read it! i still have less than no clue what the differences between spotted & florida are! (asides from the basic morphological difference, and even then, im still iffy).
ps: wanted to ask, is your dissertation the same as the spotted gar work?
reGARding your second post...we've heard that before! hahaha