So you have a problem with a young python ate two endangered rodents, yet you do not have any problem with feral cats or native snakes eating same endangered rodents? I believe that the woodland mouse is in trouble from habitat loss, not invasive pythons. It is unlikely that a cold-blooded reptile will wipe out whole endangered rodent populations. Now I ask you for last time, do some serious research on the invasives and their behavior.
Now I ask you a question: which one that eat most rodents? A cat or a python?
Hello; I made no such statement. It make me wonder if you need to re-read my posts with more care. The problems of the rodent in question do include other impacts than the pythons. To be clear, I do have a problem with feral house cats in particular. Not so much a problem with native snakes as they are part of the natural ecosystem even thou they may take some of the rodents. The likely biggest issue is habitat destruction. The point I was trying to make in that previous post, and will attempt again, is that the non-native/ invasive pythons are an additional impact on top of the problems the rodents already have.
Also the theme of these recent posts has been a response to your challenge that someone cite any evidence that there has been a negative impact caused by one of three invasive species. That challenge has been met. You apparently have even acknowledged that the pythons ate two of the wood mice in your post which I have included as a quote here.