

question: why didwednesday13 wels get confiscated but yours still allowed?
Yes I am the one running that thread. That is true. I’ve done extensive research into Silurus species, with the only one from my experience sporting 6 Barbels seeming to be Glanis. Even the other larger species like the Lake Biwa catfish (Silurus Biwaensis) and the Soldatov Catfish (Silurus Soldatovi) both have 4. The Chinese wels was definitely popularized as the Euro wels close cousin that can survive in a crate with a drop of water. Even people like Rodrigo marketed these guys for sure. Still one of my favorite fish. Just don’t expect this thing to turn into a 40 inch eating machine haha. Good work vik.The fish shown in the meridionalis thread that is currently active seems to show only four barbels; I have no idea if it is misidentified, or...?
But, oh my..."paper fish keepers' opinions"? That is delicious!![]()
I keep hearing from people on YT who think our true wels S. glanis is the chinese wels S. meridionalis and with some of them size argument doesn't work
According to the key I found, to prove the species ID vomerine tooth patches must be looked at, which I am not doing with our Mr. Wels. Perhaps it might be easier to wait until it grows to 6-8 feet.
This is kind of old too, from 1988 but seems to be the most recent genus revision cited on FishBase.
View attachment 1515529
Thank you Russ, Mike, and JJ. I can't believe I missed the barbel count so badly. I don't know why I thought all or most Silurus had 6 barbels and only asotus had 4. I had no idea almost all but glanis had 4!? (According to the ID key gilberti and wynaadensis also have 6 barbels, but their upper jaw is prominent, not lower jaw.) Which is why I dug up that ID key above to see how to tell glanis from meridionalis. But the barbel count is so unbelievably obvious versus the vomerine tooth patch comparison. Why is it then absent in the ID key?
From what I understand at the young age and small size, they can be hard to tell apart. But meridonalis is probably more offered to us because of the fact they are more common internationally, especially in china. Patterning is probably the easiest way to tell thoughMaybe the tooth count is more “reliable” when deciphering between all of the species with 4 barbels. They are pretty hard to tell apart across the board 24” or under i.e. asotus, meridonalis, soldatovi, biwaensis, lithophilus, tomodai. I’ve often wondered if the “chinese” being offered are actually meridonalis due to there size. Not sure i could pick out the few listed from a juvi line up and theres many more.
That confounded me, Russ. It is not Chinese wels a common name for Silurus meridionalis?I’ve often wondered if the “chinese” being offered are actually meridonalis due to there size.
That confounded me, Russ. It is not Chinese wels a common name for Silurus meridionalis?
EDIT: Oh I see, you meant it another way, that is, if the fish we get are actually "Chinese wels aka S. meridionalis" because of smaller than expected adult size? Is that how you meant this?