Very very very good, which would you recommend i should get first a speedlight or a macro lense?
steve
steve
speed light for sure! macro lenses are no good if you dont have enough light. sure you can get a super wide aperture like f/1.4 to let in a lot of light, but your depth of field is so shallow it makes the pic look like crap because only a small portion will be in focus, the rest will be blurred.spwd;4033298;4033298 said:Very very very good, which would you recommend i should get first a speedlight or a macro lense?
steve
That is very helpful, thank you!jcardona1;4033330; said:here's a good pic for visuals, as the cars are good at representing a fish. at a fast and big aperture, only the first car is in focus. but with a small aperture, you get everything in focus. but with a small aperture comes less light, that is where the overhead flash comes in. hope that made sense
Great shoot of the camera. two thums up.greenterra;4032596; said:This is my first ever shoot with an overhead flash so I am pretty happy with the results. The last two shots are my favorites.
View attachment 483878
View attachment 483879
View attachment 483880
View attachment 483882
View attachment 483883
View attachment 483884
View attachment 483885
View attachment 483881
Yeah thats what i thought mate thanks for the info and again great pics.jcardona1;4033317; said:speed light for sure! macro lenses are no good if you dont have enough light. sure you can get a super wide aperture like f/1.4 to let in a lot of light, but your depth of field is so shallow it makes the pic look like crap because only a small portion will be in focus, the rest will be blurred.
lots of overhead light, small apeture and fast shutter speed = super sharp pic where everything is in focus