Sheesh, who put a quarter in you guys? I haven't gotten caught up yet, but wow. And I thought I wrote a lot sometimes.
I definitely have to go back a page or two to get caught up...Rivermud;2793753; said:...was definitely a "minimum" tool rather than an optimal tool.
The definition of optimal in the case of aquaria follows along the lines of prevention. Basically overkill in most cases is a solid practice because we do not want to ever have the chance of being unprepared. In the instance of having "too much filtration" I can honestly say there is no such thing...
Well played!Jgray152;2838220; said:...I hope we can keep this is civil as possible ...
You were asked to leave that thread because you chose to use personal attacks beyond discussing the issue. Your posts were deleted for that expressed reason. I am providing an opinion, not a personal attack. I actually admire the fact that you've put forth the effort to create this tool. In fact I've actually stated so earlier in this thread.Jgray152;2842956; said:Rivermud, You can leave this thread just like you had to leave it on the other forum. I left your thread, so leave mine. you have nothing good to say about this as I had nothing good to say about yours.
Your definition and my definition of "minimum" must be different. You think of it as no room for error at all, possibly overflow and no acceptable bio volume. This is not what I think of minimum as. Like I said before, you CAN calculate the minimum, you can also add any safety factor you wan't to it. Its up to YOU to allow the calculator to choose the correct sump. If you don't add enough of a safety margin, your only asking for trouble.
Bio media is measured in volume btw. The surface area is so huge on most medias out there used in wet/drys, you can NOT calculate the media amount based on SA. Can you? I bet you can't.
Also, you say that this calculator has a preprogrammed bio volume. That is INCORRECT! This number is ADJUSTABLE by the USER. It is DEFAULTED as in, the number is saved into the Excel Sheet. You can change it any time you wan't. I have to say though, the number that is entered, is "overkill" in most situations.
This calc will give you a "suggested" bio media volume. Its "suggested" and not a required amount, because of the fact that the bio load is different in each tank. This is the reason the number given for the bio volume is MORE than you need in most situations.
The size sump dictates how much bio media you can have. The sump size is very important. Also, the user can even input the dimensions of their "area" for where the sump will be located and the calculator will pick out a sump size with that "added" variable.
The Aditional volume, if I keep it in design, will also be another "added" variable the calc will take into consideration.
So it CAN calculate based on the users needs.
The calculater can prepare as long as the correct value is used. I will say this again, in MOST situations for moderatly over stocked tanks, the value given WILL be acceptable.
Yes
You make Rube Goldberg very sad.Pharaoh;2843055; said:Seems like a lot of trouble to go through to come up with a calculator that is used for such an small purpose. Most people who build thier own sumps are building with parts that they either already have or can get relatively cheap. It would be impossible to figure in all the variables actually need to give someone a solid idea about what they are needing.
Sounds like we just need to educate people about the uses and abilities of sumps. Then let them make the decision on what they have to have for their tank.
CHOMPERS;2845106; said:Just a side note, when Paul Allen and Bill Gates were working out the bugs in Windows, they didn't give it to a bunch of computer wizards and ask them what problems a novice would have using it. Paul Allen gave it to his mother and asked her to use it. She then told him of the quirks, problems, and things that didn't make sense.