I don't think oscar are much of the snail eating type. I've never kept snails with my oscar though...
bluehairman;3200608; said:I don't think oscar are much of the snail eating type. I've never kept snails with my oscar though...
Sand is heavier than fish poop. That is unlikely to happen.bluehairman;3200600; said:Ammonia doesn't make sense... It would be converted rather quickly into nitrite. Unless you took a bunch of fish poop and buried at the bottom of the sand...
MTS are well protected with their shell structure. That is unlikely to happen.Natural_Born_Killer;3200605; said:Those snails mentioned above, would they not be a good snack for lets say, an Oscar?
Polyptasaurus;3199699; said:If you choose sand, you need to put so thin of a layer that it really just covers the bottom of the tank, if its even an inch thick, its WAY too thick. what happens is that the sand traps nitrites/nitrates and if a certain patch of sand is left untouched for too long, upon disturbing it, it can actually create sulfuric acid in your water, instantly dropping your pH to 4 or lower and doing massive damage to your fish (obviously).
Get rid of your sand if you have it too thick, or simply take enough out so that you are only covering the bottom of the glass. The most effective way I've found is to use an 8 foot hose withOUT the big syphon tube on the end of it, and cut the hose at an angle. By cutting it an an angle you not only suck more sand out, but it doesnt get clogged as easily.
Could you please tell us how you have figured out the sand can trap nitrite and nitrate? Do you vacuum the organic wastes out of the tank at all? Sand is heavier than the wastes lying around so to say, nitrite/nitrate are trapped in there at all, is practically illogical.It is very common to think that cleaning the "crap" off of the top of the sand is all you need to do. But the filth actually settles into the sand if its thick and it stays there, rotting and creating more ammonia. With that said, some people will stir up the sand and THEN do a water change, thinking that the garbage will be sucked out, but you're actually less likely to get any of the filth out that way. That is why it is better to just suck the sand out, wash it, then put it back.
Your perception does not share the perception of some of us. I use sand and gravel in all my tanks and the ones in sand are cleaner than the gravel as the organic matter doesn't get trapped among the gravel unlike the sand.Believe it or not, sand ends up being MUCH dirtier than gravel and very annoying to clean. Best way to clean it is to syphon the sand into a bucket and actually wash the sand off, then dump it back into the tank. Even then, it should be done every 3 weeks.
This is your opinion, not a fact to be followed by others. Your choice, their choice. To each, his own. It's as simple as that.Personally... I'm going back to gravel - very fine gravel, but gravel is DEFINITELY better than sand. If you don't have rays... you don't want sand.
Not all types of gravel are capable of damaging the barbels. It's not just coarse gravel with sharp edges that is responsible for the barbel damage but high levels of nitrate.Columbian Shark Catfish;3199897; said:Also, to the first post, sand should also be used for loaches and sensitive catfish. Gravel can sometimes cut their barbels